The first breakthrough in understanding
consciousness came in 1929, when German neurologist Hans Berger used electrodes
placed on the skulls of subjects to measure electrical activity within the
brain. Called the Electroencephalogram (EEG), it allowed Berger to discover two
types of electrical activity, called alpha and beta waves, that seemed to be
linked with key aspects of consciousness.
Whatever consciousness is, it is likely to be linked to so-called brain
waves- the rhythmic flows of electrical activity between neurons. Hard-working brains show the
fastest type- beta waves with frequencies up to 40 cycles a second (Hz), while
resting brains typically show slower, larger amplitude alpha waves. Drowsiness
or meditation produces even slower theta waves of 4-7 Hz, while delta waves of
just 1-4 Hz appear only during sleep.
Although its systematic study has only just
begun, consciousness- in the opinion of some eminent scientists’ today- is an
absolutely fundamental part of this universe and cannot simply be computed away
as airy metaphysics.
Having to embrace the concurrent existence of
complementary properties to explain the quantum world- such as the simultaneous
existence of both wave and particle nature for electrons- paves the way for
science to find an essential link between consciousness and primary field. From
this viewpoint the fundamental realities of the primary field and consciousness
are inseparable aspects of the same underlying process.
David
Bohm has named this underlying process the implicate order. Basil Hiley
suggests: “Mind and matter are but different projections from the deeper
implicate order where such a division does not exist.” He also emphasizes that
“the implicate order is not some woolly metaphysical construction, it is precisely
a description of the underlying process,” which
is supported by credible mathematical analysis.
Since coherent superposition is an inherent
characteristic of the quantum world, space and time are not expected to be mere
numbers at some level. At the deepest level of space even the Plank’s
dimensions can be deemed merely as expectation. Bohm and Hiley call this
pre-space, which gives rise to John wheeler’s proposed pre-geometry. At the
pre-space level according to Bohm and Hiley, the universe is an undivided whole-everything
is connected to everything else, and made coherent by the self-organizing
property of the quantum potential.
The essence of the implicate order is the one
source that unfolds both the primary field (the common source of at least
everything physical) and consciousness. Based upon this thesis, it would be
logical to infer that the one source of the world’s great spiritual traditions is grounded in
scientific reality.
Schrödinger believed in the Vedic concept
that all conscious beings are aspects of that same universal entity.(“filled
with Brahman are the things we see, filled with Brahman are the things we see
not. From out of Brahman floweth all these, from Brahman all, yet he is still
the same.”- Isha Upanishad).
Expressed in terms of our scientific worldview
today, consciousness would be manifest when the individual brains quantum state
is in resonance with the cosmic potentiality of consciousness. After
Schrödinger, we may humbly assert that we are all equipped to be tuners of the
universal source of consciousness....
Let me ask you a question. Suppose a universe
was made and nobody was there to see it? Behind this question which may seem
like a pointless debate lie some very profound enigmas. Scientists have lately
warmed up to an idea they once considered unscientific.
The idea goes by the esoteric name of weak
anthropic cosmological principle. The essence of this principle is that the
initial conditions and the natural constants of our universe were not exactly
what they are; there would be no one here to observe it, much less to esquire into its origin.
Examining the details of the universe eminent
physicist Freeman Dyson also finds that “the universe in some sense must have known that we were
coming.” The anthropic principle seems to offer a unique solution for
the particular way our universe came to be. The Big Bang theory provides that
at its inception the universe was infinitesimally small, much smaller than an
atom, and therefore, subject to the laws of quantum physics. This means the
universe could have begun in many possible ways. Thus if the anthropic
principle is factored in it turns out that the eventual evolution of
intelligent beings was a necessary condition why this universe came into being.
To quote John Wheeler “It is incontrovertible that the
observer is a participator in genesis.” The observer, that’s consciousness and we are conscious agents,
vehicles for manifestation of potentiality that was there from the start. Now
the question arises what is the nature of this observer ship? John Wheeler strongly believes that “in
defining any useful concept of reality” we have to take into account the indispensable place of the participating observer as evidenced in quantum
mechanics.” The foregoing cannot really be true unless consciousness is as
essential an aspect of nature as are the fields that give rise force and matter
and the primary field that give rise to them.
But what is this consciousness that I have
been referring to? Understanding consciousness it seems is the next big leap in
our understanding of this universe.
For something most of us are we possess, consciousness has proved
amazingly hard to pin down. As early as the 5th century AD
the philosopher and catholic Saint Augustine of Hippoidentified self-awareness as a key aspect of consciousness when he
declared: “I understand that I understand”. It took another 1200 years
before the first working definition of consciousness emerged, with the English philosopher John Locke claiming
it tobe “the
perception of what passes in a man’s own mind”. As for how this
perception emerged, the 17th - century French philosopher Rene
Descartes used what he regarded as unimpeachable logic to conclude that the conscious
mind must surely be made of different stuff from brains and bodies- a
distinction now known as Cartesian Dualism. He summed this up in the famous
saying “Cogito, ergo sum”-I
think therefore I am. The advent of anesthetics- in which physical
exposure to chemicals like ether triggered unconsciousness- had revealed an
intimate connection between the body and mind, flatly contradicting Descartes’
claim.
It seems clear that what we call “mind” is,
in part, a process that enfolds a multitude of functions at ascending levels of
complexity and refinement. The vast
majority of these functions take place below the threshold level of
consciousness and account for what keeps us alive (the most basic is the
regulation of heart-beat). Furthermore these functions are firmly rooted in the
brain’s oldest structures, structures we share with the animal world. This is
demonstrated in the laboratory as we observe various regions of the brain
respond to stimuli. So far the mind appears to be a bottom up construction, an
electrochemical computer programmed by the brain’s evolution over millions of
years.
Eminent neuroscientist John Searles’ asserts
that “all the stimuli we receive from the world are converted by the nervous
system into various rates of neuron firings at the synapses.” But he, despite being a bottom up theorist
states that “Nothing is intrinsically computational.” As we ascend to the next
level of brain functions, something happens that cannot be easily explained by
brain chemistry or algorithms. We become conscious agents. We no longer simply
sense and behave, like automatons we experience, and we affect experience. No
computer exists that can form a thought expression like; “You won’t believe
what happened to me today!” Roger Penrose argues that no computer ever can,
because “consciousness, in its particular manifestation in the human quality of
understanding is doing something that mere computations cannot.”
Penrose further insists that “a scientific world
view which does not profoundly come to terms with the problems of conscious
minds can have no serious pretension of completeness. Consciousness is part of
our universe, so any physical theory which makes no proper place for it falls
fundamentally short of providing a genuine description of the world.” Nobel
physicist Eugene Wigner states: “The principal argument is that thought process
and consciousness are the primary concepts, that our knowledge of the external
world is the content of our consciousness and that the consciousness, therefore
cannot be denied.”... to be continued.....
The quantum world that is the world of
infinitesimally small…the world of electrons and Photons, is pretty different
from what we observe in daily life. The reality at quantum dimensions is so
weird and understanding that great physicists of the status of Einstein, Niels
Bohr, Richard Feynman have failed to understand it fully. Niels Bohr quipped,
“If anybody says he can think about quantum physics without getting giddy, that
only shows that he has not understood the first thing about it”. The problem
with the world at quantum level is that the quantum particles seems to have no
regard for the rules of classical
mechanics framed by Newton and others that seems to so well describe our
observable universe.
For example
1.At quantum levels you can create reality
by simply looking at it.
2.A quantum particle
can occupy more than one place or take more than one path at the same time. This simultaneous
coexistence of all possibilities is known as coherent superposition or quantum
coherence.
3.Quantum entanglement: As shown by Non locality experiment that if we send twin
photons that were joined earlier to different sectors of space, any action
performed upon one instantaneously affects the other as if they remained
forever bound in spite of their spatial separation.
In Quantum world a quantum particle actually
exists as a wave function with the probability of finding it extending till the
end of universe but with a high probability of finding it at one particular
space. This description of quantum particle actually arises from the famous uncertainty principle of Heisenberg
who stated that it is impossible to measure the position and velocity of a
quantum particle accurately beyond a certain fixed level of accuracy defined by
his equation. This impossibility is not due to the fault of measuring
instruments but is inherent characteristics of quantum world. That the position
of quantum particle is defined in terms of probability led Einstein to utter: “God Does Not
Play Dice”. However as soon as a quantum particle is observed by a
conscious agent they collapse from their wavy nature to reality at a particular
position.
For example let us consider that you are an
electron seated in a chair. But in quantum world you are actually a wave spread
over the entire universe with high probability of finding in your chair. You
will remain in that state until and unless a conscious agent looks upon and
collapses you into reality seated in the chair. This may sound like the staff
of science fiction but the postulates and predictions of quantum mechanics have
been proved through numerous experiments like EPR and Young’s Double Slit Experiment.
THE EPR EXPERIMENT
Now the question is what is consciousness (click on the link to know more about consciousness)? Scientists
are too in debate over this question and we will deal with it in our next
article.
Let us return again to uncertainty principle of Heisenberg.
The uncertainty principle can also be stated in terms of energy and time. It
states that if time is stretched enough and we look at very very tiny interval
of time while trying to find out about the energy of a certain small volume of
space we would be so uncertain about its energy content that a particle may pop
out of existence out of nothingness provided it vanishes as soon as it appeared.
To show you how this could happen let me tell you a small story.
Around 1928 Physics was suffering from
another big problem. The two most important theorems of physics did not agree
with each other. On the one hand you had Einstein’s special theory of
relativity that described the description of particles moving at a speed close
to the speed of light encapsulated in the beautiful equation E=MC2 and on
the other hand Planks discovery of quantum and the revolution that followed
describing the bizarre rules of very very small. Problems arose when trying to
describe the behavior of particles that were small enough for quantum rules to
be applies and moving fast enough for Einstein’s special theory of relativity
to be applied, (especially the behavior of electron). If this theory could not
be married it meant that one of them had to be wrong.
At this critical moment Paul Dirac; a
brilliant scientist came up with a very elegant description of election that
helped to marry the Einstein’s special theory of relativity with plank’s
quantum mechanics.
This elegant equation is known as the Dirac
equation. In his description of electron Dirac was forced to use a set of four
equations represented by the symbol γ.
While the first to equations were quite
familiar and referred to the behavior of electron as observed in the
laboratory. The next two pair were suggesting to a type of electron never
before observed. In some way just like the electron yet very very different. It
came to be known as the anti-electron. Dirac realized that if the things and
anti-things ever meet each other they would instantly annihilate converting all
their mass into energy.
Now here was the answer to the riddle of
empty space. Heisenberg had suggested that matter could pop into existence from
empty space for very very small amount of time. Dirac provided the mechanism
how this could happen. So
actually whenever a matter particle pops into existence from empty space so
does its anti particle and then they quickly fall back upon each other and
annihilate.
Strange as it may seem just like a compulsive
credit card addict, pairs of particles and antiparticles constantly borrow
energy from space to pop into existence before annihilating again and returning
back the energy. Thus what may seem as vacuum is constantly seething with this
activity which is known as quantum
fluctuations. But as soon there is sufficient energy made available by
any source, stable particles are able to emerge and have a ‘real’ existence in
the world.
Now you might be wondering why am I
discussing so much about nothingness and quantum world?! Well for the curious
mind here is the answer…Wherever you see in the observable universe including
sun, moon; stars, you and I all have come out of this vacuum. So to understand
and get the big picture you have to understand the small…. Om tat sat